News / Corporal Punishment

Victory for child rights and violence prevention in South Africa as defence of reasonable chastisement ruled out of line with Constitution

The South Gauteng High Court yesterday ruled that the common law defence of reasonable chastisement is not in line with the Constitution, and no longer applies in our law. The judgment arises from an appeal by a father who had been found guilty of assault because he beat his 13-year-old son in a manner that exceeded the bounds of reasonable chastisement.

In practical terms the judgment means that parents who hit their children will no longer be able to raise a special defence if they are charged. The judgment does not have the effect of creating a new offence. It has always been the crime of assault to hit a child – even your own child – but if charged, a parent had a special defence which said that if the chastisement was reasonable they would not be found guilty. It is that special defence that this judgment has removed, through a development of the common law, to bring it in line with the Constitution.

The court emphasised that the intention is not to charge parents with a crime, but rather to guide and support parents in finding more positive and effective ways of disciplining children. In support of this, the court referred to an affidavit submitted on behalf of the Minister of Social Development, Bathabilie Dlamini, who agreed that the defence of reasonable chastisement is unconstitutional. The Minister pointed out that the Children’s Act aims to guide parents towards better, non-violent parenting.

The court said that protecting children was particularly important in the context of the high levels of child abuse and violence that pervade our society.

This point was driven home in the case by the first, second and third amici curiae (friends of the court) – Children’s Institute, Quaker Peace Foundation and Sonke Gender Justice, represented by the Centre for Child Law. An expert affidavit by Professor Shanaaz Mathews pointed out the linkages between corporal punishment and other forms of violence: “Experiences of corporal punishment undermine trust between a parent and child and can instill mistrust, aggression and a lack of empathy in the child. This sets the child up for a pathway of emotional insecurity and increases the likelihood for them to abuse their own children and intimate partner.”

The judgment points out that South Africa is not the first African country to do away with corporal punishment in the home – the court points out that half of the countries in Africa have publically committed to doing so (including South Africa), and that Kenya, South Sudan, Tunisia, Benin, Cabo Verde, the Republic of Congo and Togo have all actually abolished corporal punishment in all settings. The court pointed out that the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child had called on South Africa in 2014 to ban corporal punishment in the home and to promote information on positive discipline. The United Nations Committee also made the same recommendation in 2016, when it urged South Africa to ‘prohibit all forms of corporal punishment in the home, including ‘reasonable chastisement’.

The court concluded that: ‘It is time for our country to march in step with its international obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child by recognising that the reasonable chastisement defence is no longer legally acceptable under our constitutional dispensation’.

Professor Shanaaz Mathews, an expert on violence against children and Director of the Children’s Institute (University of Cape Town), welcomes the judgment as an important first step in the right direction. She points out that, “a significant proportion of children in South Africa experience beatings by caregivers every day or every week and often such beatings are for minor transgressions”.

“Sonke welcomes the ruling as an important step towards children’s rights and violence prevention in South Africa,” says Wessel van den Berg, Child Rights and Positive Parenting Portfolio Manager for Sonke Gender Justice. A large body of research shows that there’s a strong association between men’s use of violence and their exposure to harsh physical punishment as children. This ruling promises to reduce multiple forms of violence. We look forward to working with government and the broader public to roll out education campaigns that ensure parents understand alternatives to corporal punishment and can use non-violent positive discipline approaches”

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

  • Ms Karabo Ozah, Deputy Director, Centre for Child Law, University of Pretoria, 071 682 1761
  • Ms Carol Bower, Quaker Peace Centre, 061 414 6889
  • Professor Shanaaz Mathews, Director, Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town, 083 246 1676
  • Dr Steffi Rohrs, Senior researcher, Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town, 074 026 0030
  • Patrick Godana, Governent and Media Liaison MenCare Programme, Sonke Gender Justice, 073 233 4560
20 October 2017
You may also like
Civil society organisations disappointed by failure of Ministry of Police to respond to SAHRC regarding xenophobic state…
7 Dec 17 – We call on the Ministry of Police to respond to the SAHRC’s letter with urgency, and …
Sonke releases 10 year anniversary video and latest Annual Report on heels of important human rights achievements
5 Dec 17 – Celebrating a decade of working to advance gender justice in South Africa and the region.
Sonke Gender Justice welcomes UNAIDS World AIDS Day report on the urgent need to reach men and boys with HIV services
1 Dec 17 – Sonke calls on governments around the world and especially in Southern and Eastern Africa, to act …
Sonke welcomes passing of Labour Laws Amendment Bill as landmark achievement for all parents in South Africa
29 Nov 17 – Sonke welcomes the acceptance of the Labour Laws Amendment Bill by the National Assembly on Tuesday …
Sonke reiterates call for Mduduzi Manana’s removal from parliament
15 Nov 17 – Sonke notes with grave concern that Mr Manana continues to serve as a member of parliament. …
Sonke stands by the women who accused Danny Jordaan of rape and call for him to be held accountable
3 Nov 17 – Sonke calls for Jordaan to be suspended from the ANC and as SAFA president with immediate …
Sonke calls for apology and retraction from King Goodwill Zwelithini regarding recent comments on corporal punishment
4 Oct 17 – Calling for a renewed commitment from the Department of Basic Education to implement the National Protocol …
“We must have zero tolerance for all forms of violence”
3 Oct 17 – Outlining the necessity of the Five Days of Violence Prevention Conference.
Sonke calls for apology and retraction from Adv Mpumlwana for his defence of Grace Mugabe’s use of violence
28 Aug 17 – Sonke argues against Advocate Loyiso Mpumlwana’s suggestion that African culture allows for beatings.

Send this to a friend