Sonke Gender Justice

News Category: Sonke News

  • National Men’s Health Seminar

    In September, Sonke Gender Justice joined the DOH at a national seminar on men’s reproductive health.

    >> read the report from this imbizo

  • Civil Society Outrage Over the Dismissal of the Deputy Minister of Health

    The JCSMF which represents and is supported by over 20 civil society, health and research institutions and organisations in South Africa strongly condemn the dismissal of Ms Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge from her position as Deputy Minister of Health.

    At the 10th JCSMF meeting held on the eve of the 3rd SA AIDS Conference in June 2007, the former Deputy Minister of Health, agreed to open the meeting and speak about the role of partnerships in keeping the National Strategic Plan (NSP) alive. To date, she has been the only high ranking official in the national department of health to have agreed to attend and address such a meeting of civil society, health and research organisations. She has always been available to support efforts to contain the epidemic. This is characteristic of her tenure at the National Department of Health where often she has been one of very few health officials to act in a transparent, approachable, open and accountable manner.

    In her address to the JCSMF, Ms Madlala-Routledge spoke about ensuring that partnerships are created to achieve the important targets that are set out in the NSP. She stated:

    “Like you I am encouraged that the NSP sets ambitious prevention, care and treatment targets and that it makes important commitments to processes that include much needed policy, human rights and law reform. But, like you – now that the paper work is done – I want to ensure that the inclusiveness, the commitments and the implementation continues and commences. The NSP itself states that its key guiding principles include supportive leadership and effective partnerships. It specifically states that all sectors of government and all stakeholders of civil society shall be involved in the AIDS response. It therefore opens the way for much needed engagement with all sectors in our society.”

    Contrary to the statements from the Presidency, she has been a team player – she has done so by earning the respect of leading health academics, researchers, scientists, doctors, lawyers, health care workers, people living with HIV/AIDS and other users of the public health sector. Unlike other officials in the Department of Health, she has described situations how she perceives them to be and not brush matters of life and death under the carpet of political expediency. Her role was not to score political points. She knew no fear when she listened to protestors or patients in Khayelitsha or elsewhere. Over the years, she has shown respect for the work that civil society and all people living with HIV/AIDS are doing to prevent new infections and to treat existing infections. She has bravely spoken truth to power by challenging HIV/AIDS denialism, supporting evidence based interventions, publicly testing for HIV, engaging fully with civil society, and condemning confusing and ambiguous messaging on HIV/AIDS. She has rightly put the issue of our failing health crisis firmly before the nation, when many other health professionals are afraid of doing the same for the real fear of losing their job too.

    We believe that her dismissal, despite the high esteem with which she is held by a wide cross-section of health care workers, community based organisations and other civil society players, is a major setback to the development of a unified national response to HIV/AIDS, so crucial to the effective implementation of the NSP. Instead it will fuel a climate of fear amongst people working in the public health sector and prevent them from speaking up about HIV/AIDS and the health crisis we face as a country. This is not the type of society we want to live in nor is it the one we all fought for.

    The JCSMF will therefore support on going international and regional petitions of protest against her dismissal.

    The founding members of the JCSMF endorse this statement:

    • AIDS Law Project
    • Health Systems Trust
    • Centre for Health Policy
    • Institute for Democracy in South Africa
    • Open Democracy Advice Centre
    • Treatment Action Campaign
    • UCT School of Public Health & Family Medicine
    • Public Service Accountability Monitor
    • Médecins Sans Frontières.

    This statement is also endorsed by: 

    • The AIDS Consortium
    • Wits Pediatric HIV Clinics (WPHC)
    • Southern African HIV/AIDS Clinician Society (SAHCS)
    • School of Public Health at the University of the Western Cape
    • People’s Health Movement
    • Positive Women Network
    • Sonke Gender Justice

    CAPRISA

    For more information, please contact:

    • Fatima Hassan (2000ALP) 083 279 9962
    • Professor Helen Schneider (2000CHP) 083 275 0277
    • Professor David Saunders (2000PHM) 082 202 3316
  • WHO says world must step up violence prevention

    Countries around the world need to scale-up domestic violence prevention and make a concerted effort to measure violence-related deaths, injuries and health conditions, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). In Third Milestones of a Global Campaign for Violence Prevention Report 2007, the agency reviews progress since the 2002 creation of the Global Campaign for Violence Prevention, assessing how far the world has come and where more work is needed.

    “Beyond an increased awareness of the burden of violence-related deaths and physical injuries, the last five years have witnessed a major growth in the understanding of how violence contributes to a wide spectrum of non-injury health consequences and health risk behaviours across the entire lifespan,” it says.

    Although much remains to be done, the report notes considerable progress. By 2007, three of the six WHO regional committees had adopted violence prevention resolutions, more than 25 countries had developed reports and/or plans of action on violence and health, and more than 100 officially appointed health ministry focal persons were in place to prevent violence, the report finds.

    The report offers a five year agenda to follow-up on key recommendations. WHO recommends that countries:

    • Create, implement and monitor national action plans for violence prevention;
    • Enhance capacity for collecting data on violence;
    • Define properties for, and support research on, the causes, consequences, costs and prevention of violence;
    • Promote primary prevention responses;
    • Strengthen responses for victims of violence;
    • Integrate violence prevention into social and educational policies, and thereby promote gender and social equality;
    • Increase collaboration and exchange of information on violence prevention;
    • Promote and monitor adherence to international treaties, laws and other mechanisms to promote human rights; and
    • Seek practical, internationally agreed to responses to the global drug trade and global arms trade.

    In 2003, WHO emphasised collaboration among the diverse violence prevention organisations and individuals. In 2004, it promoted the “need for rigorous methodological guidelines in order to better estimate the economic impacts of violence and monitor the cost-effectiveness of prevention strategies.” In 2005, it stressed the need for systematically designed prevention programs. Its 2006 report reinforced that investing in violence prevention can pay sizeable dividends. This year’s report offers lessons learned throughout the process.

    Director-General of the World Health Organisation Margaret Chan notes, “Visible results for violence prevention builds confidence, and in turn, the political commitment and momentum required to intensify and expand the prevention of violence.”

    To view the new report, please visit http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241595476_eng.pdf.

    Taken from the Family Violence Prevention Fund Newsletter, Speaking Up, 13 August 2003
  • WHO research

    New WHO research shows that programmes targeted at men are helping men to change sexist, risky and violent behaviour.

    Read more.

  • Global Coalition on Women and AIDS

    Sonke Gender Justice co-Director, Dean Peacock, will be addressing the Global Coalition on Women and AIDS Leadership Council Meeting on 3 July 2007 in Nairobi. The meeting is aimed at imparting new information on strengthening HIV programming for women and girls and energising and seeking inputs from leaders in a range of sectors to enhance HIV programming and advocacy for women and girls.

  • Co-Founders Win “Best Man” Award

    Co-founders of Sonke Gender Justice, Bafana Khumalo and Dean Peacock, have received top honours in the Public Service Category in the 2007 Men’s Health “Best Man” awards.

  • SA Slips

    South Africa has failed to protect its women from violent crime and needs to jack up its approach to gender equality.

    The Sonke Gender Justice Network, a leading South African-based monitoring group made these scathing findings in a country report tabled at the 51st session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women in New York this week. The call comes as South Africa slipped two notches in international ratings, to find itself counted among the worst transgressors of women’s rights in the world.

    Even though South Africa had made strides in appointing women to key positions in the public and private sectors, the report said gender violence in the country had reached alarming heights. A staggering 326 620 women and children were victims of crime last year.

    Crime statistics in South Africa showed that women and children continued to bear the brunt of crimes in six categories: murder, attempted murder, rape, common assault, indecent assault and assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.

    The report, which was compiled on behalf of the Presidency, said low conviction rates for rape and domestic violence cases suggested that perpetrators continued to commit violence against women with relative impunity.

    It said the government needed to increase its budgetary allocation for law enforcement and increase funding for gender work. In the past three years South Africa has gone from 90 to 92 on the gender development index. Norway, Iceland, Australia, Ireland and Sweden led the way, as countries where women enjoyed more equal treatment.

    Burkina Faso, Mali, Sierra Leone and Niger were at the bottom of the list. The ranking looked at the adult literacy rate, the combined primary to tertiary education gross enrolments ratio and estimated income.

    Norway, Iceland and Australia have 99% adult literacy for both men and women, an equal ratio of enrolments at educational institutions between men and women, and women earn almost the same income as men. But in Mali, Sierra Leone and Niger, there is a gaping difference between the development of men and women.

    Mali has only 11% literacy among women compared with 26% for its men. Thirty percent of enrolments at educational institutions were for women compared with 40% for men.

    The survey indicates that in Sierra Leone 24% of women are literate compared with 46% of men, and 55% of women enrol at educational institutions compared with 75% men. In Niger 15% of women are literate compared with 42% of men and 18% of women enrol at educational institutions compared with 25% of men.

    Although South Africa was ahead of most African countries, it was still far behind other middle-income countries such as Mexico, Thailand and Uruguay. Egypt, Mauritius, Tunisia, Cape Verde and Algeria pipped South Africa to sixth place in the continental ratings.

    Sonke’s co-founder Bafana Khumalo said gender transformation in the country would remain elusive until men were recognised as an important part of the process. “Unless we challenge men to be responsible and talk to them about gender issues, it’s going to take a long time to change,” said Khumalo.

    Gender activists this week reacted with concern at the country’s drop in international ranking. Lisa Vetten, a researcher for the Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre to End Violence Against Women, said it underscored the weak implementation of good policies and the country’s reliance on the criminal justice system.

    “Essentially, this drop suggests that the gap between rhetoric and reality remains unchanged, and that perhaps even a kind of stagnation or paralysis has set in,” she said. “We need more solutions than just the criminal justice system,” added Vetten. Spokesman for the Commission for Gender Equality, Yvonne Mogadime, said that at a recent conference, delegates had identified pervasive and deep-rooted patriarchy as the most serious impediment to the advancement of women and gender equality in South Africa.

    Only 10 years for raping a girl

    Despite life sentences being mandatory, children’s abusers are getting lesser punishments, writes Khadija Bradlow.

    It was a sweltering December afternoon in Alexandra, north of Johannesburg, when Mpho Skosana (not her real name) went looking for her playmate in a neighbouring shack.

    Among the misshapen Lego blocks of poverty and deprivation, the four year-old went looking for laughter with her friend.

    Instead, she was raped. Her friend wasn’t home, but his 38-year-old father was. “I tried to cried [sic] but he threatened to kill me if I don’t keep quiet,” the little girl testified, according to a social worker’s report.

    The child’s sister took her to the Victim Empowerment Centre at the Alexandra Police Station, where a doctor confirmed she was the victim of a sexual attack. The social worker’s report details a pathetic convergence of circumstances that led to the child being raped: “poverty” is listed in the section titled “environmental circumstances”. The child’s mother had died a year earlier, leaving her in the care of an alcoholic father and six siblings, most of them already in their late teens.

    Mpho’s rapist went on trial in 2004 and was sentenced to only 10 years in jail – this despite the Criminal Law Amendment Act obliging courts to sentence rapists of children to life imprisonment, unless they find “justified and compelling circumstances” to warrant the imposition of a lesser sentence. The legislation was enacted in 1997 to impose harsh penalties on those found guilty of certain serious crimes including the rape of a minor. The reality, however, is that a wide interpretation of what constitutes “justified and compelling circumstances” has resulted in inconsistency in the sentencing of sexual offenders.

    The Act does not outline specifically what qualifies as such circumstances, leading to a variety of seemingly arbitrary factors being taken into account by courts when handing down sentence.

    Mpho’s rape and similar others are examples of cases that Elizabeth Mokoena has taken on. Mokoena works for ADAPT, an anti-sexual violence NGO based at the Alexandra Victim Empowerment Centre. She showed the Sunday Times a list of cases involving sexual crimes against minors where the regional courts had failed to impose life sentences and instead issued fines or shorter jail terms.

    In one case, the rapist of a 10-year-old was sentenced to 10 years. In another, a perpetrator who raped his two-year-old niece, was given 18 years. Such inconsistency in the sentencing of sexual offenders where the complainant is a minor is contained in a series of reports, released by the Open Society Foundation, on the impact of the minimum-sentencing legislation.

    According to the reports, one of the successes of the Criminal Law Amendment Act has been with regard to the application of minimum sentencing in rape cases. The number of prisoners serving sentences for sexual crimes increased from fewer than 10 000 in 1995 to just below 20 000 by 2005. A significant proportion of them are serving life sentences.

    Prior to 2000, notes a report, “there were virtually no prisoners serving life sentences for sexual crimes, but by the end of 2002, the number of prisoners serving life sentences overtook the prisoners serving determinate sentences of longer than 20 years for sexual crimes”.

    Michelle O’Sullivan, an advocate for the Women’s Legal Centre, argues that despite this increase in convictions, “judges have departed from legislative benchmarks” with regard to sexual offences.

    She says the limiting of judicial discretion in respect of certain rape cases has not stopped judges reverting to stereotypical assumptions about women and relying on “rape myths”, such as the complainant’s previous sexual history and a prior relationship with the offender.

    An example of this is the case of the State vs Mvamvu before the Supreme Court of Appeal in 2005. The offender had repeatedly abducted and raped his common-law wife, who had also obtained a domestic violence protection order against him. The judges held that the customary-law marriage of the accused and the complainant was a compelling circumstance to justify a lesser sentence.

    Gender Development Index

    Top 10 Countries

    1. Norway
    2. Iceland
    3. Australia
    4. Ireland
    5. Sweden
    6. Luxembourg
    7. Canada
    8. United States
    9. Netherlands
    10. Switzerland

    Bottom 10 Countries

    1. Zambia
    2. Malawi
    3. Mozambique
    4. Burundi
    5. Democratic Republic of Congo
    6. Chad
    7. Central African Republic
    8. Burkina Faso
    9. Mali
    10. Sierra Leone
    11. Niger
  • South Africa Country Report to the UN CSW 2007

    frontpage image for the SA country report

    The South Africa Country Report to the UN Commission on the Status of Women, 2007 was prepared by Donald Ambe, Vanja Karth, Bafana Khumalo, Eleanor McNab, Dean Peacock, and Jean Redpath. The report was prepared by Sonke Gender Justice on behalf of the Office on the Status of Women, Office of the Presidency, Government of the Republic of South Africa, for the 51st Session of the Commission on the Status of Women, New York, March 2007.

    Read the Executive Summary below, including a breakdown of the key themes and key recommendations in the report, or download the complete report.

    Executive Summary

    At the 48th session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in 2004, the South Africa government and the governments of other participating countries made formal commitments to implementing a range of recommendations aimed at “involving men and boys in achieving gender equality”.

    These commitments made at the UN CSW are consistent with the values enshrined in the South African Constitution and core to the goals of South Africa’s new democratic dispensation.

    However, in South Africa, as throughout the world, gender inequality continues to undermine democracy, impede development and compromise people’s lives in dramatic ways. Indeed many studies show that contemporary gender roles and especially rigid notions of manhood contribute to gender based violence and other forms of gender inequality and exacerbate the spread and impact of HIV and AIDS. In 2007, the country continues to face high levels of gender based violence, an HIV and AIDS epidemic and deeply entrenched gender inequalities.

    In the face of this, government and civil society organisations have begun to put in place a range of initiatives intended to increase men’s involvement in achieving gender equality. Reflecting this, a growing number of South African men have begun to take action in private and public ways to reject rape and domestic violence and to create a more gender equitable society.

    Key themes emerging from report:

    1. Growing numbers of men are taking a stand against gender based violence and for gender equality. Despite high levels of male violence against women, many men care deeply about the women in their lives including their partners, family members, co-workers, neighbours and community members. Given this, many men are eager to challenge customs and practices that endanger women’s health and support the well being of women.
    2. Groundbreaking work with men to achieve gender equality is occurring across South Africa. South Africa is widely recognised as hosting some of the most important interventions and research focusing on men and gender equality of any country in the world. The National Gender Machinery has established a Working Group on Men and Gender Equality tasked with multi-sectoral training and coordination. Within civil society, interventions such as the Men as Partners Network and Stepping Stones are widely described in international public health literature as best practices. Similarly, researchers have produced an impressive body of literature on men and gender in South Africa, focusing on issues such as gender based violence, HIV and AIDS, fatherhood and shifting notions of masculinity.
    3. There is visible support by some senior government officials for work with men – but more sustained commitment needed. Senior government officials have shown important leadership and have made public commitments to engaging men in achieving gender equality. Former President Nelson Mandela attended the fi rst national men’s march in 1997. President Thabo Mbeki has also made clear his commitment to engaging men in a number of important speeches – including during his second inaugural speech. Amongst others, Minister of Arts and Culture, Pallo Jordan, and Premier of the Western Cape, Ebrahim Rasool, have both been proactive in supporting work with men. However, there is still a need for greater levels of commitment amongst senior political figures and senior management on issues of gender, and a particular need for men to take these issues on board.
    4. Widespread adoption of work with men within government departments has occurred. There is evidence that different South African government departments have recognised that work with men is important and have launched a number of different initiatives aimed at involving men in achieving gender equality. For instance,9 society organisations should engage in dialogue to develop a clear set of principles for working with men to achieve gender equality. A preliminary list might include the following: recognise that men have a stake in changing and can be important allies in achieving gender equality; be accountable to, supportive of and in ongoing dialogue with women’s rights organisations; be committed to internal accountability through agreed upon code of conduct; emphasise a rights based and social justice approach; affirm gay rights and make the connection between homophobia and rigid models of masculinity. The Department of Health launched the Men in Partnership Against AIDS initiative in 2002; the Department of Social Development launched the Men in Action Campaign in partnership with the National Network on Violence Against Women; the OSW spearheaded the development of the Men and Gender Equality Working Group within the National Gender Machinery and both the Department of Correctional Services and the Department of Provincial and Local Government have actively involved men during their respective 16 Days of Activism campaigns.
    5. There is a need for greater clarity of purpose about the goals of work with men, as well as increased coordination and planning. Despite evidence that government departments recognise that work with men is important, many initiatives have faltered due to a lack of capacity. Problems related to capacity, clarity of purpose, coordination, quality of work and long-term commitment indicate the need for additional capacity building.
    6. Men’s violence against women remains unacceptably pervasive. Government has been unable to adequately address men’s violence against women. Indeed reported rates of domestic and sexual violence have increased steadily since 1994. This has led to charges that the government has not made suffi cient efforts to address violence against women. Critics contend that when 90 percent of rapists and nearly two thirds of men who kill their intimate partner go unpunished, government inadvertently sends a message to perpetrators that, in all likelihood, they can commit violence against women with relative impunity.
    7. Greater dialogue and accountability between organisations working with men and women’s rights organisations is needed. Very few organisations working with men engage in regular dialogue with women’s rights advocates. Particularly when organisations working with men espouse paternalistic attitudes about men “needing to protect women”, this lack of dialogue and accountability has alienated important potential allies in the women’s advocacy sector.
    8. Current efforts to increase men’s involvement in achieving gender equality rely too heavily on workshops and community outreach. Government and civil society efforts to engage men are frequently overly narrow in their approaches and are often limited to conducting workshops without due attention to audience, followup or community involvement. To date, organisations working with men have only occasionally used other important change strategies like advocacy for policy change or rights-based activism. These are particularly important in addressing structural issues such as education, housing, social welfare and unemployment. Working to include all ‘men’ in gender initiatives is a challenge, particularly reaching those in rural areas.
    9. Efforts to involve boys in achieving gender equality should be expanded. Work to involve boys in achieving gender equality currently receives very little attention from either government or civil society. While civil society organisations and government do off er general diversion services to boys and girls who have been in conflict with the law, the absence of the passage of the Child Justice Bill means it is still only a minority of children in conflict with the law who benefit from diversion programmes. The Bill aim to create the context for community and victim involvement, protect young people after arrest, provide diversion programmes that teach offenders different values and alternative role models, and provides for restorative justice for victims, off enders and the community.
    10. South African funding for gender equality work with men is insufficient while some international funding comes with strings attached. South African government funding for work with men and boys tends to be short-term, event specific and ad-hoc. This increases civil society dependence on foreign donors, some of whom pursue prescriptive approaches that fi t poorly with local realities.
    11. Not enough work with men taking place in rural parts of the country or with traditional leaders. Much of the work taking place with men occurs in urban and peri-urban areas leaving rural areas where 40% of South Africans live. In these areas, traditional leaders play a particularly important role and oversee the traditional justice systems and structures which, in rural areas, continue to be used more regularly than the formal criminal justice system.
    12. Very little work with men addresses broader socio-economic conditions exacerbating gender inequalities. Government and civil society have not paid enough attention to the connection between men’s violence, HIV/AIDS and broader socio-economic forces. More research and interventions are needed that focus on how gender roles and relations in South Africa are situated in a socio-economic context characterised by high levels of inequality, endemic levels of generalised violence, poor health outcomes and limited social welfare services.

    Key Recommendations:

    “Gender equality, development and peace in the 21st century”

    These recommendations are addressed to all stakeholders identified in the 2004 CSW commitments, namely: “Governments and, as appropriate, the relevant funds and programmes, organisations and specialised agencies of the United Nations system, the international financial institutions, civil society, including the private sector and nongovernmental organisations, and other stakeholders”.

    1. Intensify efforts to end men’s violence against women and to involve men in achieving gender equality: Extremely high rates of gender based violence and the urgency of the HIV and AIDS crisis demand that government, civil society and the private sector strengthen their commitment to increasing men’s involvement in achieving gender equality. This will require greater budgetary allocations to support the enforcement of existing legislation and to increase funding for gender equality work.
    2. Develop a clear set of principles to guide work with men. Government and civil society organisations should engage in dialogue to develop a clear set of principles for working with men to achieve gender equality. A preliminary list might include the following: recognise that men have a stake in changing and can be important allies in achieving gender equality; be accountable to, supportive of and in ongoing dialogue with women’s rights organisations; be committed to internal accountability through agreed upon code of conduct; emphasise a rights based and social justice approach; affirm gay rights and make the connection between homophobia and rigid models of masculinity.
    3. Use and expand the mandates of existing policy frameworks to strengthen coordination and planning. Since 1994 government has put in place a number of policy frameworks to foster gender equality and to facilitate citizen involvement in achieving development goals. These include the National and Provincial Gender Machineries, the National Policy Framework for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality of 2002 and the Municipal Structures Act of 1998. Government and the National Gender Machinery (NGM) should strengthen and support these by mainstreaming within theme efforts to involve men and boys in achieving gender equality. In particular, the OSW should utilise the NGM Working Group on Men and Gender Equality so that it can carry out the coordination and training role intended for it.
    4. Foster closer collaboration between women’s advocacy organisations and organisations working with men to achieve gender equality: Closer dialogue and accountability offers the potential for closer collaboration, more rigorous work with men and hopefully greater success in achieving gender equality.
    5. Tailor interventions to address different groups of men: Results from a survey conducted by Sonke Gender Justice indicate that some men appear eager to play a more involved role in ending violence against women while other men appear threatened by gender transformation. Violence prevention interventions need to be tailored to respond to the perceptions of these different groups of men, providing more gender equitable men with the necessary support, skills and resources to act on their convictions while challenging the myths and misconceptions held by those men who resist change.
    6. Augment workshops and community education approaches by employing a broader range of social change strategies including rights based advocacy and community mobilisation to demand an end to men’s violence against women. Shifting public perception that gender based violence affects us all and cannot be dismissed as a “women’s issue” requires that men become more visible and outspoken about their opposition to gender based violence and demonstrate their willingness to take public stands against it-by joining marches, by engaging the media and by taking concerted efforts at the local level to demand justice.
    7. Implement integrated, systems focused approaches. Working with men and boys to change deeply held beliefs about gender roles and relations requires comprehensive, multifaceted strategies – including approaches that focus on structural factors such as education, housing and unemployment. Government has a leadership role to play in promoting and supporting this kind of collaborative work.
    8. Provide consistent, reliable and coordinated funding that promotes sustainable approaches and organisations: Far too many organisations working with men are hampered in their efforts by precarious funding or by ideological restrictions which accompany donor funding. The South African government should provide multi-year funding that encourages organisational development and promotes effective, rigorously monitored interventions.10
    9. Build capacity with the public sector to engage men and boys in achieving gender equality. Government should support partnerships between civil society organisations working with men and the national and regional governments. South African Management Development Institute (SAMDI), the South African Local Government Association (SALGA) and the Department of Provincial and Local Government (DPLG) to train key representatives of government to engage men.
    10. Expand efforts to engage boys and young men in achieving gender equality. Primary prevention and early intervention strategies should be put in place to strengthen new families, meet the needs of children exposed to violence and identify and support at-risk youth. International public health literature indicates that these approaches are effective and they are consistent with the commitments made throughout the South African Constitution to promote and protect human rights.
    11. Build the youth capacity to assert leadership on increasing gender equality. Young men and women are often in the forefront of efforts to address gender based violence and the gendered dimensions of HIV and AIDS. Using its learnership model, government should make a commitment to developing the next generation of gender and AIDS leaders.
    12. Launch a “Men and HIV Services campaign” to increase men’s use of HIV services. The Department of Health should convene a key stakeholder meeting to identify and develop evidence based strategies for increasing men’s utilisation of HIV services-especially STI treatment, HIV testing, ARV uptake and male circumcision. This should include a national task force on male circumcision as well as partnerships with existing media and social marketing organisations to develop messages that encourage men to pursue health seeking behaviours and challenge the attitudes and values contributing to gender based violence.
    13. Increase men and gender equality work in rural areas – especially with traditional leaders. 40% of South Africans still live in rural areas yet very little work with men on gender occurs in these parts of the country. efforts should be made to integrate work with men into existing rural structures, programmes and services – including traditional healers and leaders, traditional justice systems, agricultural extension programmes and rural schools.
    14. Support rigorous monitoring and evaluation of work involving men and boys. Both government and civil society must prioritise documenting and evaluating the work that they implement which involves men and boys to achieve gender equality. As well as the opportunity to share lessons and experiences, such evaluations will help to avoid duplication, encourage collaboration and guide the development of future work.
  • Understanding Men’s Perceptions of their own and Government’s Responses to Violence Against Women

    Executive Summary:

    From November 10-15, 2006 Sonke Gender Justice conducted a survey of 945 men in the greater Johannesburg area. Men were selected from diverse racial and ethnic groups in the same general proportion as these groups are represented in South Africa.

    Men were asked two initial questions about how they viewed responses to violence against women. These were:

    1. Is the Government doing too much, not enough or the right amount to address the problem of violence against women in South Africa?
    2. Are men in general doing too much, not enough or the right amount to address the problem of violence against women?

    Men were then asked to rank according to priority six potential strategies for dealing with violence against women. The options offered were in two broad areas:

    1. what government could do and
    2. what men could do themselves.

    Findings:

    The survey results indicate that men in the greater Johannesburg area hold a range of quite different perceptions about gender equality and about violence against women.

    Men’s perceptions of what they and other men are doing to respond to violence against women: In response to the question “are men doing enough to end violence against women”, only a small proportion of men (15.3%) felt that they were doing too much to end violence against women while a majority of men (50.1%) felt men should be doing more.

    Men’s perceptions of the government’s response to violence against women: In response to the question “is the government doing enough to end violence against women, 41.4% of men surveyed said that the government is doing too much to end violence against women. At the same time, 38.4% of men surveyed said that government is not doing enough to end violence against women. In other words, very similar numbers of men within all population groups seem to support and oppose government efforts to promote gender transformation.

    Recommendations: Extremely high rates of gender based violence and the HIV/AIDS crisis demand that Government and civil society organisations take action to increase men’s commitment to ending violence against women. These survey results indicate that some men appear eager to play a more involved role in ending violence against women while other men appear threatened by gender transformation. Violence prevention interventions need to be tailored to respond to the perceptions of these different groups of men.

    Government and civil society organisations should encourage more gender equitable men to play a more active role in ending violence against women and should provide these men with the necessary support, skills and resources. At the same time, government and civil society should challenge the myths and misconceptions held by those men who resist change and inform them about the reality of endemic levels of violence against women and a still inadequate criminal justice system response that fails to protect victims or deter perpetrators in any meaningful way.

    >> Download the full report

  • Research into the Impact of PEPFAR Funding

    On behalf of OSISA, Sonke Gender Justice is conducting research into the impact that PEPFAR funding is having on HIV/AIDS organisations in Southern Africa.

    Background

    In 2003, US President George Bush signed the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

    This plan has made significant amounts of funding available to organisations in 15 countries, including a number of countries in Southern Africa. The funding is predominantly available for HIV/AIDS treatment and care, as well as abstinence-only prevention programmes. PEPFAR openly promotes a particular moral agenda, and many NGOs accepting PEPFAR funding are signing agreements that restrict their ability to work with commercial sex workers and prevent work around termination of pregnancy. PEPFAR also strongly supports an “abstinence only” approach to preventing HIV infection, and has required many NGOs receiving grants to include disclaimers around the effectiveness of condoms.

    PEPFAR’s approach is highly controversial, and in the United States the Alliance of Open Society Initiatives (AOSI) along with a range of other US-based organisations, is suing the US Government in relation to a specific policy that emanates from PEPFAR:  the prostitution loyalty oath.

    OSISA is concerned that requiring organisations to adhere to conditions may infringe on organisations’ rights and may ultimately be harmful to public health. It has thus commissioned this research to gather information about US policy on HIV and AIDS and its impact on Southern African organisations.

    Research

    Sonke Gender Justice is conducting an informal survey of NGOs and organisations in Southern Africa to gather information on experiences in relation to US policy on HIV and AIDS, particularly in relation to PEPFAR’s influence on activities related to condom use, abstinence and the prostitution loyalty oath.